Executive Summary
National Audit Office Value for Money Report
- Taken as a whole, the current range of employment programmes
has been successful for those who participate in them. More people
are in work than ever before and both the New Deal for Lone Parents
and the New Deal for Partners have been successful in helping
participants into work, particularly in respect of lone parents
whose employment rate has improved steadily since 1992. Early
results for the Pathways to Work programme for incapacity benefits
claimants show promising results. At the same time there remain
almost 3 million households where no one of working age is working
with a cost in terms of welfare benefits which we estimate at 12.7
billion a year.[Footnote a] Many people in workless
households face multiple barriers to work and the Department for
Work and Pensions needs to engage more of those people and
households most distant from the labour market.
- Evidence suggests that many adults in workless households would
like to work, but that they face multiple barriers to work, such as
low skills, disability, a lack of affordable and flexible
childcare, or caring responsibilities and may have been on benefits
for a long time. People in workless households do not belong to any
particular benefit group; many are on incapacity benefits, many are
lone parents on Income Support, some are on Jobseekers Allowance,
and some do not claim any benefits. Two of the Department for Work
and Pensions employment programmes, the New Deal for Lone Parents
and the New Deal for Partners, are aimed at workless households.
However, people in workless households can access all the
Departments employment programmes, delivered by Jobcentre Plus or
private sector providers, although this may depend on the type of
benefit they are claiming, and for certain pilots and area-based
initiatives, where they live. We focus on the programmes most
likely to be accessed by people from workless households. Figure 1
lists the major employment programmes that people from workless
households can access, and key data about each programme. Care
should be taken in making comparisons between programmes, as they
serve different client groups, some with many barriers to work
requiring considerable assistance, some with fewer barriers and
requiring less assistance. This has an impact on the results
programmes achieve in terms of job outcomes and cost per job.
- This report focuses on employment and skills services for the
people from workless households. Although people from workless
households have a range of skill levels and training needs, the
low-skilled are over-represented in workless households, so our
discussion of support for skills focuses on access to basic skills
support, and outreach/engagement provision which can often be a
first step into learning for low-qualified, disadvantaged adults.
Many workless households include young people not in education,
employment or training, however we have not included specific
analysis of this issue. This report does not cover employment and
skills issues specific to:
- ethnic minorities we plan to publish a separate report on
increasing the employment rates for ethnic minorities; and
- sustainable employment we plan to publish a separate report
that will examine the support available to help people stay in work
and advance.
This report focuses on employment and skills services in England
because the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh and Northern Irish
Assemblies have devolved responsibilities for education and skills
policies.
Employment programmes have helped many people into work;
however, relatively few people from workless households participate
in these programmes
- Both the New Deal for Lone Parents and the New Deal for
Partners have been successful in helping participants into work,
but more needs to be done to encourage more people to
participate. To date, around half a million people who
have participated in either the New Deal for Lone Parents or the
New Deal for Partners have entered jobs (Figure 1). In 2005-06,
between 43 and 48 per cent of participants on these programmes
entered employment.
Figure 1 ("Main employment programmes that people from
workless households can access") is unavailable in this version of
the executive summary.
- The employment rate for lone parents has improved steadily
since 1992, but at the current rate of progress the Department for
Work and Pensions is unlikely to achieve its lone parent employment
rate targets[Footnote b] unless more people are
encouraged to participate in New Deal for Lone Parents for example
in November 2006, seven per cent of workless lone parents were
participating in New Deal for Lone Parents.
- Participation in the New Deal for Partners has been small. Once
on the programme half of participants find work but only around 200
people join the programme each month. Data on take-up of
invitations to participate shows that very few partners participate
even after attending a mandatory work-focused interview. It is
likely that the low participation can be addressed with a strategy
that better reflects the needs of partners, together with a better
understanding of the needs of partners and their barriers to
accessing support, and improvements to the confidence and
experience of the Jobcentre Plus personal advisers in working with
partners.
- More is being done to help people on incapacity
benefits into work. Over half of people in workless
households have a long-term disability and the Department for Work
and Pensions and Jobcentre Plus have recently increased their
efforts to help people on incapacity benefits into work. This is an
important measure, as nearly 50 per cent of all people dependent on
benefits (both workless households and other households) are on
incapacity benefits.
- Incapacity benefits claimants can access support from a
personal adviser through Jobcentre Plus offices, and Pathways to
Work, a programme which provides additional support through:
- a personal adviser, who can help people find work by diagnosing
barriers to employment and providing assistance to overcome
them;
- the Condition Management Programme, designed to help people
manage their health condition in a work environment; and
- financial assistance during the first year of employment.
Pathways to Work was first piloted in a number of areas in 2003. It
has since been rolled out to 40 per cent of the country and by
April 2008, the programme will be made available to all new
claimants of incapacity benefits. Early results of Pathways show it
is increasing exits from incapacity benefits by around eight
percentage points at six months.
- The percentage of participants in New Deal for Lone Parents and
New Deal for Partners who enter employment has been declining with
time. This pattern is mirrored by other employment programmes where
this percentage has been declining or stable for some years. The
reasons for these patterns are unclear one possibility is that
programmes have helped those who can most easily enter the labour
market and are now helping those requiring more support.
- Many people in workless households do not engage with
mainstream employment programmes. This means that effective
outreach strategies are essential. The New Deal programmes
mainly draw in people who are actively seeking work (Jobseekers
Allowance claimants) and the Pathways to Work pilot is currently
aimed at people making a new (or repeat) claim for incapacity
benefits, although existing incapacity benefits claimants can
volunteer to participate. However, many workless people have been
claiming incapacity benefits for some time, and as a result are not
automatically offered the chance to participate in New Deal or
Pathways. For example, 1.6 million people have been on incapacity
benefits for more than five years. Many of these people would like
to work, given the right support and encouragement, and outreach
services can bring them closer to work. There are examples of
innovative outreach activity from Jobcentre Plus and other bodies.
However, outreach activity is currently small scale and there is no
clear strategy for outreach.
- Community-based services and private sector providers are often
well placed to engage with the most disadvantaged households. They
have a presence in many places, and some people see them as more
approachable than a formal agency like Jobcentre Plus. At the
moment, efforts to target workless people in many areas are
hampered by ineffective arrangements for sharing data on where
economically inactive clients live. Many outreach providers expend
a great deal of effort just on making contact with clients furthest
from the labour market. While there are innovative examples of
outreach activity, it is currently fragmented and few outreach
providers evaluate their work. Even where evaluation of outreach
services shows they are worthwhile, it can be difficult to apply
successful models more widely. Outreach is often very
labour-intensive, making it costly to transfer elsewhere, and is
also often tailored to local needs, potentially reducing the
transferability of programmes.
Many people in workless households have multiple barriers to
getting work. To address their needs comprehensively requires
flexible, tailored assistance and effective partnership
working
- People in workless households are likely to face
multiple barriers to work. Employment programmes have been
very successful at helping many people into work, and the number of
workless households has reduced in the last 10 years. However, the
greatest reduction has been in households where individuals are
actively looking for work, and where there are few barriers to
work. Today, the households where no one is working are likely to
be households where people have been dependent on benefits for a
long period and where people have multiple disadvantages or
barriers to work.
- Tailored, flexible support is required to tackle
multiple barriers. The tailored support in New Deal and
other employment programmes is helping people overcome many
barriers but people still tend to enter employment programmes based
on the type of benefit they are receiving, which constrains the
services they can access. The need for a more flexible menu of
assistance was identified in Building on the New Deal[Footnote c] but a fully personalised
service, (for example, where someone with a disability, low skills
and childcare needs can easily access support to help them manage
their health condition at work, training and childcare assistance)
is not yet available except in a small number of pilot
programmes.
- Jobcentre Plus personal advisers and other providers of
employment services have made good use of a personalised,
case-management model, which involves ongoing one-to-one contact
with lone parents and other out-of-work individuals. The next
challenge, if the most disadvantaged families are to be helped into
work, is to extend this personalised service model to families and
households, identifying barriers to work that exist within the
household and packaging assistance for total household needs. From
April 2007, the Jobcentre Plus target structure has been amended to
give a clearer focus and incentive for Jobcentre Plus staff to
focus on helping parents into work.
- Effective partnership working is required to tackle
multiple barriers. Helping people into work requires a
sound understanding of the local labour market and the barriers
experienced by people in the local community. This makes effective
local collaboration essential and the Learning and Skills Council
and Jobcentre Plus are both increasing their involvement and
collaboration with Local Strategic Partnerships.[Footnote
d] The expanding network of partnerships helps generate local
solutions, but working in this way is increasing the demands on
staff. The agencies have responded by reviewing their operational
approach and putting greater resource into partnership engagement,
but this area will remain a future challenge.
- The Department for Work and Pensions is also piloting the City
Strategy, an ambitious attempt to give local partners in 15
disadvantaged areas the chance to innovate and tailor services to
meet local needs. City Strategy consortia, that bring together all
organisations with an interest in employment, are identifying key
local priorities, and where possible pooling funding to provide
flexible support and join up the many different services on offer.
The approach is being piloted over two years from April 2007, so at
this stage it is too early to tell if they will deliver a step
change in service.
- The Department for Work and Pensions and Jobcentre Plus are
implementing new models of service delivery to make services more
responsive to individual and local needs. Private sector providers
have been used in Employment Zones for some time to case-manage
clients on New Deal programmes and the Department is implementing a
similar model to support the national roll-out of its Pathways
programme. In the City Strategy, approaches to join up service
delivery are being tested. It is essential to test new approaches
if significant reductions in worklessness are to be made, and
considerable work is being undertaken to develop and implement
performance measures.
Value for money statement
- The New Deal for Lone Parents has been successful at helping
many lone parents into work and provides value for money. Although
New Deal for Partners is successful in helping those who
participate into work, very few people join the programme. The
value for money of both programmes could be improved by encouraging
more people to participate, by taking action on the recommendations
made below. The New Deal programmes have been extensively evaluated
and the Department for Work and Pensions monitors the
costeffectiveness of its various employment programmes. However,
the Department and Jobcentre Plus face rising expectations from
Government and the community. As unemployment has reduced, the
Government has set a challenging aspiration that 80 per cent of all
workingage adults will be in work. To meet this target more of the
longest term and hardest-to-reach benefits claimants, many of whom
are in workless households, will need to be assisted into
work.
- In order to deliver more support to the people furthest from
work without losing the advantages that New Deal programmes are
delivering to their existing client groups, the Department for Work
and Pensions and Jobcentre Plus have to make decisions on spending
priorities by client group. The most complex clients require
intensive assistance, which increases the cost per job outcome, but
the potential return is high because people with multiple
disadvantages are usually on benefits for longer periods. Helping
the most disadvantaged into work also brings wider economic and
social gains well in excess of the benefit savings.
Conclusions and recommendations
Employment programmes have been successful for those who
participate, but many people in workless households do not take
part. The Department for Work and Pensions needs to engage more of
those people and households most distant from the labour
market.
- Outside mainstream
services, external providers and voluntary sector organisations
have shown that they are well placed to engage with out-of-work
people and are using innovative strategies to engage the hardest to
help.
- As a priority, Jobcentre Plus and the Learning and Skills
Council should build on their work with partnerships, such as Local
Strategic Partnerships and through the City Strategy Consortia, to
develop local strategies for outreach services.
- The Department for Work and Pensions can also do more to
support outreach providers. A first step would be for the
Department to develop clear protocol on how nonpersonalised
information on locations of worklessness can be shared with other
parties.
- The Government has
committed to challenging targets for reducing child poverty, and
this can be reduced if all adults in the household are given
support to enter work. The New Deal for Partners engages with
partners of benefit claimants, but more needs to be done to reach
these partners, and to understand the needs of partners, their
barriers to accessing programme support and worklessness as a
family problem. The Department for Work and Pensions will be
introducing regular six monthly work-focused interviews for
partners of Jobseekers Allowance claimants from April 2008. In
conjunction with this, personal advisers may need support to
increase their confidence and expertise in advising partners about
overcoming barriers to employment that relate to the family.
Jobcentre Plus are currently providing additional, specific
training for lone parent advisers in using persuasive/selling
techniques to gain customers commitment to finding and sustaining
work. This training may form the basis, after evaluation, of
support for engagement with partners.
A wide range of support is available to help people make
the transition to work, but perceived and actual barriers persist.
Jobcentre Plus and local partners can do more to improve awareness
of available support, and to join up services in integrated
pathways.
- Although many measures
have been introduced to smooth the transition to work, and to make
it financially worthwhile to be in work, awareness of them is not
always high. This reduces their power as incentives, as well as
their effectiveness in reducing in-work poverty. Jobcentre Plus has
done some work to improve awareness of the financial benefits of
being in work, and needs to continue to improve client awareness of
these measures (which include benefits from other bodies, such as
Council Tax Benefit). Better-off calculations have proved to be a
powerful tool at informing people to consider leaving benefit and
entering work. Jobcentre Plus has implemented a national minimum
standard requiring that better-off calculations are conducted at 20
per cent of interviews and needs to continue to ensure that these
calculations are offered consistently at work-focused interviews
this would increase motivation to look for work, and help people to
target their job search.
- People from workless
households often face multiple barriers to work and need to access
many services. Early assessment, and support in moving from one
stage of preparation to the next, are important for the people
furthest from work. The Department for Work and Pensions and
Jobcentre Plus should ensure that people with multiple barriers are
given early entry to programmes. Jobcentre Plus, as a key service
delivery agency, and the Learning and Skills Council, which does
not deliver services but is the major commissioning body for
further education services, need to take the lead in working with
all service providers to develop clear and integrated client
service pathways. These service pathways should ensure that clients
needs are assessed as early as possible, and people access the
services they need as they are ready for them. This needs to be
supported by common management information and sharing of client
information to ensure that clients can be tracked through their
journey towards work, providing data protection requirements
allow.
- Many people in workless
households are deterred from looking for work because their family
responsibilities or health problems mean they cannot commit to
fulltime work or fixed hours. The Department for Work and Pensions
has made a commitment that where flexible working arrangements are
available, Jobcentre Plus adverts will state this, and personal
advisers will tell customers about their right to request flexible
working. In addition, Jobcentre Plus labour market recruitment
advisers could play a role by encouraging employers to think about
opportunities for flexible work when they list vacancies and by
promoting to employers the benefits of family-friendly policies.
Local partnerships should investigate the potential for flexible
work brokerage schemes such as Sliversof- Time (see Case Study 4 on
page 34), and ensure that partnership members are themselves
promoting flexible work opportunities where possible.
Government is increasingly focusing on partnership
working and localised service delivery as key strategies for
reducing worklessness. Central agency decisions and practices need
to support this approach.
- The increasing focus on
local empowerment, regenerating local communities, and tailoring
services to the needs of the local economy requires full engagement
from Jobcentre Plus district staff and the Learning and Skills
Council local partnership teams if it is to be successful. Both
need to ensure that they understand the increasing responsibilities
of district and local staff to engage with local partners that this
approach brings and resource these responsibilities
appropriately.
- Changes to service
provision proposed centrally also need to consider the implications
in the emerging, localised approach to services. The Department for
Work and Pensions is investigating ways to ensure local input and
flexibility in its new centralised procurement model, and future
changes will need to take the same approach.
In order to reach the Governments aspiration of an 80
per cent employment rate more needs to be done to reach a greater
number of out-of-work people who are not actively seeking work. The
current balance of investment by programme, activity and client
group needs to be reviewed to assess whether it is
optimal.
- To achieve the Governments
aspirational employment rate of 80 per cent will need around
one-fifth of the economically inactive population to move into work
one million less people on incapacity benefits, one million more
older workers in work and 0.3 million more lone parents in work.
Many of these people have little engagement with employment and
education services and currently most of the spending within
employment programmes is on people actively seeking work
(Jobseekers Allowance claimants). The Department for Work and
Pensions needs to review the allocation of expenditure by client
group and assess the return on investing more on service provision
for the groups most distant from the labour market.
- Mapping of service
delivery at a local level also shows that the bulk of funding and
activity is concentrated on job search activities and other
preparation activities. Local Strategic Partnerships and/or City
Strategy consortia provide an opportunity for assessing the total
allocation on different activities in their clients progress
towards work, and for assessing the benefits of devoting a greater
proportion of funding and activity to engage people in employment
programmes in the first place.
- [back from footnote a] This figure is a
conservative estimate and does not include Housing Benefit or
Council Tax Benefit.
- [back from footnote b] The targets are:
(1) to increase the lone parent employment rate by at least two
percentage points and (2) to reduce the difference between this
group and the overall rate by at least two percentage points over
the three years to spring 2008.
- [back from footnote c] Building on New
Deal: local solutions meeting individual needs, Department for Work
and Pensions, 2004.
- [back from footnote d] Local Strategic
Partnerships are non-statutory, multi-agency partnerships, with a
reach that match local authority boundaries. They bring together at
the local level the different parts of the public, private,
community and voluntary sectors.