A recent Jobcentre Plus survey indicated few significant
differences in the satisfaction levels as between ethnic minority
and white customers.
Value for money assessment
Whilst the majority of ethnic minorities are helped into work
through mainstream services, the Departments initiatives
specifically designed to contribute to closing the ethnic minority
employment gap cost some 15 million in 2005-06.
The costs of the employment gap comprise the cost of benefit
payment and lost taxation (1.3 billion), lost output (7.3 billion,
see Footnote 1) and wider social costs.
Assessing the Departments strategy for significantly reducing
the employment gap in pure value for money terms would not be
reasonable, since it would ignore the wider benefits and social
justice associated with getting ethnic minorities into employment,
including the governments aim to reduce child poverty.
In this report we have therefore focussed on the effectiveness
of the Departments strategy. In terms of effectiveness, whilst the
Department has achieved a reduction in the employment gap there is
more that can be done to achieve further increases in ethnic
minority employment.
Our conclusions and recommendations
- The Department has given a high priority to reducing
the employment gap for ethnic minorities and has
consistently used its mainstream employment services as
the principal instrument for closing that gap, with some
degree of success. However, the Department’s strategy
for targeting additional support on ethnic minority
communities has lacked continuity. We consider that
this has had an adverse impact on the effectiveness of
the efforts by Jobcentre Plus to reduce ethnic minority
unemployment. A series of pilot projects aimed at
increasing ethnic minority employment have been trialled
but not continued or rolled out nationally. The Department
does not, however, accept that this strategy shift lacked
continuity, nor that this had an adverse impact on
effectiveness. In the Department’s view, although there
was a short period of transitional difficulties, this preceded
a move to more effective, better funded strategy.
- The Department has moved away from a direct focus
on ethnic minorities towards a focus on disadvantaged
groups and areas. Decisions about how to use and
prioritise discretionary funds are now taken at the local
level, through City Strategy consortia or Jobcentre Plus
districts. The Department has also noted that without
increased effort it could take 30 years to eliminate the
employment gap between ethnic minorities and the
overall population.
- As noted, this shift in focus carries opportunities to
concentrate help on those members of the community
who are most disadvantaged; but also carries the risk
that ethnic minorities may not receive the help that
they need to gain employment. The Department will
need to use its role of strategic oversight to minimize
this risk and to reduce the time taken to eliminate the
employment gap. It is with this in mind that we make the
following recommendations:
- Issue The Departments current strategy devolves
decision making on area-specific projects and programmes to a local
level. The main current initiatives City Strategy and the
Deprived Areas Fund allow local decision making to decide what
projects to support to address problems of worklessness in the
light of the make up of the disadvantaged community. Most City
Strategy consortia in areas where there are significant ethnic
minority populations have specific targets for getting ethnic
minorities into employment (paragraph 2.24).
Recommendation The Department should require all
future City Strategies for areas with significant ethnic minority
populations to include measurable targets for ethnic minority
employment as a condition of funding. The Department does not
accept this recommendation on the grounds that power has been
delegated to the local level and targets can be included through
negotiation between the Department and local organisations. We also
recommend that the Department should put in place appropriate
controls so that the Deprived Areas Fund adequately covers the
needs of the ethnic minority population, including the hardest to
reach and those furthest from the labour market.
- Issue The effectiveness of New Deal programmes for
ethnic minority customers could be improved through increased
flexibility in the timing and content of services to move people
closer to the labour market, and tighter control over the quality
of providers. New Deal is one of the key vehicles for
getting hard to help ethnic minorities in to employment. However
some New Deal programmes need to be more flexible to be able to
effectively address the employment challenges faced by ethnic
minorities (paragraph 2.28).
Recommendation In developing its proposals for
more flexible New Deal programmes, the Department should address
the aspects of New Deal which require more flexibility if they are
to fully meet the needs of ethnic minority customers including the
time to get on training and the length, content and format of the
courses and introduce the necessary changes. The Department should
take action in accordance with its procurement protocols where
training providers are not performing satisfactorily.
- Issue Discrimination remains a serious barrier for
ethnic minorities, but relatively few examples are recorded by
Jobcentre Plus. Whilst Jobcentre Plus works with employers
to create a more level playing field, and personal advisers and
contact centre staff take action when discrimination is reported to
them, NAO believes that Jobcentre Plus could have a greater role in
making ethnic minority customers aware of procedures for reporting
suspected cases of discrimination (paragraphs 3.8 and 3.9).
Recommendation Jobcentre Plus should consider
innovative ways to increase awareness amongst ethnic minorities of
reporting arrangements where discrimination has been perceived to
occur. Nationally, the Department should with other key players
explore the possibility of encouraging employers to obtain a
recognized kitemark certifying that they are an equal opportunity
employer.
- Issue Outreach activities by Jobcentre Plus working
with voluntary organisations have an important role to play in
bringing the hardest to reach sections of the ethnic minority
community closer to the labour market. During the
transition from the Ethnic Minority Outreach programme to new
funding arrangements, some Jobcentre Plus offices are significantly
reducing the resources devoted to outreach. In doing so they risk
losing the skills and experience of some local voluntary sector
organisations and their links to some isolated sections of the
ethnic minority community (paragraphs 2.9, 3.5 and 3.6).
- Recommendation Jobcentre Plus District
managers annual plans should incorporate, where appropriate,
outreach work identifying the services local organisations can
provide to ethnic minority customers, and working in partnership to
make effective use of the skills and experience of these
organisations. Jobcentre Plus local offices should collate and
share information on the services available from such organisations
for example in a database.
- Issue Jobcentre Plus personal advisers do an impressive
job in helping ethnic minorities find employment, but most of those
we spoke to reported frustrations with time pressures and lack of
good information (paragraphs 3.17 and 3.18).
Recommendation To increase personal adviser
effectiveness Jobcentre Plus should identify the most efficient
routes for spreading good practice in ethnic minority employment
practices, and bring these to the attention of all relevant
personal advisers. Jobcentre Plus should build on its Diversity
Challenge to encourage opportunities for personal advisers to share
experiences and best practice and participate in training on ethnic
minority issues. The Department should re-assess the time limit for
work focussed interviews taking account of efficiency needs, so
that there is sufficient time to provide an effective service for
customers with complex or multiple barriers to employment and
English language difficulties.
- Issue Research conducted in 2005 showed few significant
variations in satisfaction of ethnic minority customers with the
service received, though some gave somewhat lower performance
ratings to most aspects of service as compared with white
customers (paragraph 3.23).
Recommendation The Department should address the
technical issues that have prevented them from undertaking a follow
up customer survey of ethnic minorities and carry out such a survey
in 2008 to identify trends since the last survey in 2005. In the
light of the results, the Department and Jobcentre Plus should draw
up an action plan to address any issues where Jobcentre Plus
performance in respect of ethnic minority customers is falling
short. Jobcentre Plus should also research and draw up an action
plan in relation to communicating their services more effectively
to ethnic minority customers.