Skip to main content
Home > Publications
Share this: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin

Culture, media and leisure

Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General on the 2008-09 accounts of the Imperial War Museum

The Comptroller and Auditor General has qualified his audit opinion on the Imperial War Museum's annual accounts because of an irregular lease arrangement for a new security system.

NAO logo

"I have qualified my opinion on the financial statements of the Imperial War Museum for the year ending 31 March 2009. My qualified opinion is due to the irregular use of resources relating to the acquisition of a new fire and security system by the Museum.

"The Museum should have sought approval from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport before entering into the arrangement and this lack of authority has led me to conclude that the transaction does not accord with the intention of Parliament and so is irregular. I am encouraged by the Museum’s commitment to improve future capital investment appraisals as a result of my findings."

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, 17 June 2010

The Comptroller and Auditor General has qualified his audit opinion on the Imperial War Museum's annual accounts because of an irregular lease arrangement for a new security system. The Museum did not obtain approval from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport or the Treasury before entering the arrangement, and retrospective approval has not been given.

The Imperial War Museum is a charitable non-departmental public body governed by a Board of Trustees. In 2008-09, it received almost £24 million in public money from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and raised over £18 million from trading, admissions and a variety of other sources.

During 2006, the Museum identified the need to update the fire and security system at its Lambeth site and, in 2008-09, spent over £600,000 on the project. At this time, the Museum perceived it had a funding shortfall. To counter this, it devised an arrangement which saw the assets that formed the system sold to a finance company and leased back. The Financial Memorandum of the Museum required it to seek prior approval from the Department. However, it failed to do so.

In addition, there was no evidence of a formal review process for the business case or potential funding options in accordance with guidance from HM Treasury. The processes for approval by the Museum’s Board of Trustees did not provide a full identification of options or risks. The Museum has responded to these findings by identifying improvements to the assessment of capital expenditure, which it will apply to future significant capital investments. These improvements are disclosed within the Museum's Statement on Internal Control.