Collaborative Relationships
Case Studies
Best Practice Model
|
Step 1 - Familarisation
|
Step 2 - Vision
|
Step 3 - Measurement
|
Step 4 - Action Plan
|
Case Studies
Britannia Field Development
Dates: April 1993 - October 1998
The Britannia field was one of the largest known remaining gas
fields in the U.K. to be brought onto production.
With estimated gas reserves of 3 trillion cubic feet, the field
produced at its peak enough gas to meet at least eight percent of
the country’s energy needs.
Operated jointly by Chevron and Conoco on behalf of an
international consortium, Britannia is located 130 miles northeast
of Aberdeen in the U.K. sector of the North Sea.
The field was developed with the major part of its gas
production pre-sold under long-term contracts. The main feature of
the huge development is a production, drilling and accommodation
platform comprising a 28,000 tonne topside.
As a member of the Infield Alliance with operators Conoco (U.K.)
Ltd and Chevron U.K. Limited, our collaborator AMEC were
responsible for front end and detailed design, procurement, hook-up
and commissioning, project management of the topsides and
information technology and office support services for the
project.
Coryton
Dates: 1995 - 2006
The Coryton refinery occupies 370 acres bordered by the River
Thames to the south and Holehaven Creek and Canvey Island to the
east.
The refinery processes 33 million litres of crude oil a day and
produces approximately 10% of the UK’s transport fuel. Our
collaborator, AMEC, provides project engineering services and
related procurement and contract management services and is an
integral part of BP’s refinery asset support group to the extent
that they manage the project’s budget on behalf of BP.
The relationship commenced in 1995 and has developed with
changes in refinery ownership. The current ‘evergreen’ contract has
recently been renegotiated to demonstrate BP’s ongoing satisfaction
and commitment to the relationship.
HMS Illustrious
Dates: 2003 - 2005
Illustrious is a Royal Navy ‘Invincible’ class aircraft carrier
that entered service in 1982.
This 104 week project with £120m target cost was an in-service
refit as part of a rolling programme of major warship upgrades and
was designed to see her through to 2012, when it is planned that
she will be replaced by the new Queen Elizabeth class carriers.
The primary aims of the refit were to:
- Maintain the vessel to sustain high readiness until the next
upkeep period and beyond to her Out of Service Date
- Update the vessel to comply with legislation,
- Replace high cost driving equipments and improve
habitability
- Upgrade the vessel
The refit was carried out by our collaborator, Babcock
engineering and the Rosyth Dockyard and was the third major carrier
refit undertaken, so there was a significant opportunity to benefit
from previous learning.
A partnering approach was adopted, as it offered the best
vehicle for sharing of learning and cost reduction.
ETAP
Dates: 1995 - 1998
Our collaborator, BP’s, Eastern Trough Area Project is located
240 km east of Aberdeen in the North Sea and is an integrated
development of nine different reservoirs with differing ownership
and “operatorship”.
Six separate fields are operated by BP and a further three
fields are operated by Shell.
ETAP ranks as one of the largest North Sea projects of the last
fifteen years. The ETAP platform was completed at AMEC’s Newcastle
facility, and was unusual in so far as the physical size and weight
of the platform exceeded the lifting weight of the offshore
installation cranes, and it therefore had to be built in two
sections.
The project achieved exceptional performance all round: the
schedule delivery target was beaten by two months; 18% savings were
made against the Capex target estimate; the 6-week offshore hookup
which was achieved represented significant improvement on the
industry norm.
Key to the success of the ETAP project was the level of
integration, collaboration and openness achieved amongst Alliance
members (BP, AMEC, KBR, Barmac, Heeremac and Consafe-Facilities
Alliance) resulting in exceptional performance by all.
E4
Dates: 1993 - 2001
E4 was a major petro-chemical construction project at BP’s
Grangemouth refinery undertaken by an alliance of 7 companies.
Our collaborator, BP, was the client, and the other members of
the alliance, from across the U.K., were Lilley Construction,
William Hare, U.K. Construction and Engineering, SSL and AMEC
Capital Projects.
This was one of a number of alliancing arrangements operated by
BP at Grangemouth. These involved appointing specialist
contractors, to handle the wide range of engineering disciplines
involved in the construction of a new plant.
All the selected companies worked together as a closely
integrated project team, building carefully on relationships which
in some cases had been forged over many years of previous projects.
Partners were chosen as much for their approach to partnering and
alliancing, and the wider issues of project management, as for
their own proven track records in cost and efficiency.
The installation, part of a £500m expansion programme at the
refinery, which is strategically situated at the terminus of the
North Sea’s Forties Pipeline Transportation System, was the first
plant in the U.K. to be able to synthesise ethanol to the E4 level,
and as such a critical venture.
The project was characterised by innovative working and
communication arrangements and empowerment of personnel at all
levels to suggest “fixes” and solutions to assist the process.
Andrew
Dates: 1994 - 1998
In the notoriously difficult exploitation of North Sea oil and
gas reserves, which is BP’s principal area of upstream activity, it
had become imperative by the early 1990s to achieve drastic
reductions in development costs to remain globally competitive.
It was recognised that technological advances alone would not
achieve this, but that a fundamental shift in the oil industry’s
traditional and often adversarial contracting relationships was
also essential to break through the cost barrier.
At this point, the Andrew field, which had been discovered over
20 years earlier, had consistently failed to meet the business
model required for it to move into production, so BP selected it as
a breakthrough challenge for a pioneering alliance of seven
contracting companies, of which our collaborator, KBR (then Brown
and Root) was one, to develop offshore facilities for it.
The power of the alliance surprised even its most ardent
supporters by the unexpected degree of commercial success that it
delivered, surpassing all anticipated levels of performance to set
new benchmarks for the industry.
Shearwater
Dates: 1997 - 2000
The Shell Exploration and Production (Shell / Esso) Shearwater
alliance project involved the design, engineering, construction,
installation, hook-up and commissioning of a complex integrated
processing, utilities and accommodation platform designed to
produce sales-quality gas.
It was completed by our collaborator, AMEC at its Newcastle
facility. Exceptional performance in delivery was required across
the entire scope of the project.
The significant achievements which completion of this project
represented were accomplished through innovation, forward planning
and collaborative working between all alliance members.
It was recognised early in the development of Shearwater that a
concentrated effort would be required in order to deliver a result
that was more than just “business as usual”.
The use of an alliance contract with aligned objectives and a
range of risk and reward elements set the challenge for the
alliance to maximise Net Present Value for the Shearwater
co-ventures and produce financial rewards for extraordinary
performance for all the alliance partners.
This represented a true win / win scenario that was successful
because in a true partnering spirit every aspect was open to
challenge, even Shell’s specifications and standards.
Clair
Dates: 2001 - 2005
The Clair field is located off The Shetland Isles in about 140
metres of water. It covers an area of 220 square kilometres.
The Clair development comprised a conventional platform with
production and process topsides facilities supported by a fixed
steel jacket. The development was the first fixed platform in the
west of Shetland area.
Clair was not established as an Alliance project but used
learning and collaborative behaviours developed through Andrew to
generate innovation and establish a target cost that then made the
project economically sanction-able.
The project was initiated with pre-sanction scoping in 2000 and
was sanctioned in 2002. Production started in 2005. The operator,
BP, targeted a total cost for the platform at around £200 million,
a relatively low cost solution which was deemed essential for the
field to receive development sanction.
Previous attempts by UK contractors, most recently in 1998, to
deliver a viable solution, managed only to get costs down to £300
million.
To overcome this cost hurdle, the company had to look outside
the UK – specifically to the Gulf of Mexico, known for its simple
cost-effective platform designs – for new approaches to project
delivery.
Our collaborator, Wood Group’s, acquisition of Mustang in Huston
was key to delivery of the project.
Terra Nova
Dates: 1998 - 2002
Terra Nova is the first harsh environment development in North
America to use a Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO)
vessel.
Production from the field began in January 2002. Innovation and
cost drove the Alliance approach with the formation of the Grand
Banks Alliance (SBR Offshore, Doris Conpro, PCL Industrial
Constructors, Coflexip Stena, our collaborator Halliburton Canada
and FMC Canada) to carry out engineering, procurement,
construction, installation, commissioning and possibly
pre-development drilling activities up to the production of first
oil.
The project partners and Grand Banks Alliance consequently
established a single alliance: the Terra Nova Alliance, with each
company participating on a risk-and-reward basis.
This was a risk and reward contract with performance linked to
Capex delivery and operational efficiency.
The Terra Nova Oil Field was discovered in 1984 by Petro-Canada,
who are the operator and 34% interest holder. The field is the
second largest off Canada’s East Coast, located 350 kilometres off
the coast of Newfoundland and Labrador. Field reserves have been
estimated at 406 million barrels (Mbbl).
The hostile environment posed numerous challenges to the project
with shallow water depths - between 90m and 100m and a mean annual
wind speed of 35kmph, with the strongest recorded wind speed being
145kmph and the largest recorded wave height being 25m.
The area is also characterised by the seasonal presence of
floating sea ice, ranging in thickness from 0.5m to 1.5m, produced
by the freezing of the ocean's surface layer and icebergs.
Low water temperatures require that fluids such as hydraulic
control fluids be heated or treated to lower their freezing point.
Similarly, low temperatures combined with the waxy nature of the
crudes require that the flowlines and riser are insulated to reduce
wax deposition.
The FPSO is designed to operate in moderate sea ice, up to a
limit of five-tenths coverage and to disconnect, as required, to
avoid heavy pack ice and potential collisions with icebergs.