Delivering programmes at speed
Published on:Insights to help decision-makers determine when or how a programme should be delivered at speed.
Insights to help decision-makers determine when or how a programme should be delivered at speed.
Since we first published our Framework to review programmes in 2017 there has been no let-up in NAO reports on major projects and programmes, most recently on Crossrail, the Emergency Services Network and the Stonehenge by-pass road. From the need to manage the risks of untried approaches to signs warning of unrealistic cost estimates, this […]
We are keen to support those responsible for both delivering and overseeing government programmes. In that spirit, we today publish our Framework to review programmes summarising what we ask when auditing major programmes. It draws from our experience of around 200 studies and includes examples of what we have seen. Our work provides insights on […]
This review suggests key questions to ask when reviewing major programmes.
This report assesses the problems that the Ajax programme has encountered and the challenges the MoD faces in delivering it.
The MoD’s current controls for how it manages two major military programmes on behalf of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are clear.
Our overview of the Ministry of Defence includes information on how the MoD spent £65bn in 2021-22, manages its major programmes and has responded to the conflict in Ukraine.
This publication outlines some of the challenges in estimating and managing costs that we have observed in our work on major projects. It offers Accounting Officers and senior decision makers some ground rules and thoughts on factors to consider when challenging costs.
Capacity and capability issues, including a lack of digital skills, have contributed to delays to government’s Pensions Dashboards Programme.
This report examines the management of the Cabinet Office-led Get ready for Brexit campaign.
This report makes early observations on the progress and risks in upgrading the A303 between Amesbury and Berwick Down.
This investigation provides transparency over the government’s progress introducing T Level qualifications.
This report examines projects leaving the Government Major Projects Portfolio, which comprises the biggest and riskiest projects across government
Our Insights teams provide insights and expertise on how public services can be improved.
Public sector bodies could avoid £500 million in costs over five years if they improve how they procure common goods and services.
Sellafield nuclear site is not yet achieving value for money due to concerns over project management, the pace of delivery and staffing.
This investigation is about acquiring land and property for Phase One (London to the West Midlands) of the High Speed 2 programme
Gareth Davies uses the NAO’s insights to outline what government needs to do to make public money work harder
The Cabinet Office reports efficiency savings across shared government functions, but they could implement a more robust approach.
More recent version available We published an updated version of this framework in April 2021 Background Major programmes are expensive, high profile and carry great uncertainties and risks. It is not surprising that many fall short of their objectives, in terms of cost and/or outcomes. The NAO has completed about 140 reports on major projects […]