Business and industry

Adult apprenticeships

Apprenticeships for adults offer a good return for the public money spent on them overall. However, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills could improve value for money significantly by targeting resources on areas where the greatest economic returns can be achieved.

Police officer holding mobile device

"The apprenticeships programme has been providing a good return for public spending. Nevertheless, the Department should set its sights higher in order to get better value from the £0.5 billion and rising now spent on adult apprenticeships each year. It needs to target resources more effectively; confirm the training provided is in addition to what would have been provided without public support; and make sure that the funding system is informed by robust information on the cost of delivery."

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, 1 February 2012


Apprenticeships for adults offer a good return for the public money spent on them overall, according to the National Audit Office. However, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills could improve value for money significantly by targeting resources on areas where the greatest economic returns can be achieved.

The Apprenticeship Programme expanded by 140 per cent between the 2006/07 and 2010/11 academic years. Apprentices aged over 25 account for 68 per cent of this increase. Most of the increase in the programme has been in just 10 apprenticeship occupations. Apprentices and inspectors are generally positive about the quality of apprenticeships, with 91 per cent of apprentices satisfied with their training; but the rapid expansion of the programme brings risks that need to be managed. One concern is that in 2010/11, 19 per cent (34,600) of apprenticeships lasted less than six months, when most are expected to last at least a year.

The NAO estimates that advanced apprenticeships yield higher returns than intermediate apprenticeships. Spending on adult apprenticeships overall could be producing an economic return of £18 for every £1 of public spending, compared with the Department’s estimate, based on a different set of assumptions, of £28 per £1 spent. But all these estimates assume that the training would not have happened without public funding. The Department has not yet assessed the extent to which this is true. It has commissioned research on the matter and expects to know the results in early 2012. The Department and the National Apprenticeship Service have not so far targeted specific sectors on the basis of economic returns, but intend to do so in future.

Most apprenticeships in England are at a lower level than those offered by other countries. For example, only 33 per cent of apprenticeships are at an advanced level (equivalent to two A-levels), compared with 60 per cent in France.

Overall, the Apprenticeship Programme is well coordinated and is better managed than a previous government programme, Train to Gain, for example by maintaining a central register of approved providers, with a single national contract and account manager for each.

The rates paid to training providers by the Skills Funding Agency on behalf of the National Apprenticeship Service are not based on sufficiently robust information on the cost of the training provision, and so the Agency and Service do not know the extent to which providers may be earning surpluses or incurring losses on some types of apprenticeship. Furthermore, some employers are not paying the expected contribution towards training providers’ costs. 


Publication details:

ISBN: 9780102975369 [Buy from TSO]

HC: 1787, 2010-2012

Share this content

NAOdirect email alerts

Get notified by email of publications, news, events and other updates:

cookie reports - The National Audit Office Cookie Policy
This site uses cookies - click here to view our cookies policy