The Cabinet Office will have to work with other government departments to ensure that the full benefits of its shared services strategy are realised and that service is maintained, according to a report from the National Audit Office today.
In December 2012, the Cabinet Office published its Next Generation Shared Services strategy. This set out how it intended to reduce the cost of administering finance, human resources and procurement services through sharing back-office functions. The Cabinet Office estimated that the savings would be between £400 million and £600 million per annum. The estimated implementation cost was between £44 million and £95 million. To date, the total cost of participating departments has not been collated. The Cabinet Office spending to date on the strategy was £9.8 million.
The Cabinet Office has established two new independent shared service centres. These measures mean a significant change in the role of the Cabinet Office. The Cabinet Office is now responsible for the strategic management of the performance of the outsourced providers in the two shared service centres that provide services to 140,000 customers. The overall programme is broadly on track.
Amongst the NAO’s recommendations is that the Cabinet Office should ensure that departments sign up to the standard operating model, and do not implement unnecessary variations to services.
The Cabinet Office needs to have management information that is robust, more timely and comparable to show that its shared services initiatives have achieved value for money. It will also need to make sure the full benefits of the entire shared services programme are properly realised and tracked.
The NAO today says that the Cabinet Office and other government departments will need to be clear in their reporting of the savings that have been achieved through the Next Generation shared services, as well as the savings that would have been achieved by reduced activity as a result of government spending constraints.
Previous NAO studies have found that the government, as a whole, had not been able to demonstrate value for money from these initiatives.
In 2012, the Committee of Public Accounts was disappointed in how the Cabinet Office had previously engaged with its recommendations. Although the Cabinet Office has made progress, the NAO considers that only two of the seven recommendations have been implemented in full and five are still in the process of being implemented. The Cabinet Office should complete its work to address the recommendations made by the Committee in its 2012 report.