Background to the report
Government uses regulation to deliver public policy outcomes in a wide range of areas, for example, to ensure food safety, protect the environment, or promote competition in the UK economy. As a European Union (EU) member state, the UK operated within an EU regulatory framework, with many regulations harmonised to facilitate the European single market.Jump to downloads
Following EU Exit, many UK regulators have taken on functions previously carried out by the EU. This report assesses how regulators have managed the transition and are responding to the opportunities and challenges of EU Exit.
Scope of the report
This report considers three regulators whose work has been significantly affected by EU Exit. The report seeks to draw out common issues to help inform regulators and policy departments as they develop regulation after EU Exit, both in the three areas covered and more broadly across government.
We have examined:
- the Health and Safety Executive’s (HSE’s) role in chemicals regulation, in particular the Chemicals Regulation Division;
- the Food Standards Agency’s (FSA’s) role in regulating food safety and standards; and
- the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA’s) roles in enforcing competition and consumer protection law; operating the Office for the Internal Market; and preparing to provide subsidy advice within the UK subsidy control regime.
All three regulators covered in this report have taken on significant new responsibilities and were allocated additional funding as a result of the UK leaving the EU. The regulators implemented measures aimed at ensuring continuity in their respective sectors on Day 1 after the transition period ended, in some cases this involved delaying new regulatory requirements, or extending deadlines. All three are building capability to match their increased responsibilities but are facing operational challenges that need to be addressed as they move away from interim arrangements. These include recruiting people with the necessary skills, bridging information and data gaps, and planning for the future when there is uncertainty over long-term workloads in some key areas.
Government has set out a broad ambition for regulatory reform and sees opportunities for improving regulation outside the EU. All three regulators and the respective policy departments are at an early stage with developing strategies for reaching their future state, while still having to manage the operational challenges that have already arisen following EU Exit. Until long-term strategies are fully developed, there is a risk that regulators’ current plans to meet operational challenges may be wasted effort and not align with longer-term ambitions.
“EU Exit has had a major impact on many UK regulators. They need to overcome many challenges if they are to manage the transition successfully, including recruiting the right specialist skills. It is essential that regulators and policy-makers develop their future strategies as soon as possible to avoid wasting effort on short-term work and to ensure the decisions they make now meet their longer-term goals.”Gareth Davies, the head of the NAO
- Report - Regulating after EU Exit (.pdf — 556 KB)
- Summary - Regulating after EU Exit (.pdf — 100 KB)
- ePub - Regulating after EU Exit (.epub — 1 MB)
- ISBN: 9781786044280 [Buy a hard copy of this report]
- HC: 61, 2022-23
View press release (18 May 2022)