Search results for 'Project and service delivery'

Clear all filters

Showing 121 - 140 of 245 results

  1. The art of spending public money wisely

    Report

    Published on:

    An interactive summary of the NAO’s presentations at Civil Service Live events, 2015, on four pervasive issues blocking public service improvement.

  2. Accountability to Parliament for taxpayers’ money

    Insight Good practice guides

    Published on:

    The incentives on government Accounting Officers to prioritise value for money are weak compared to those associated with the day-to-day job of satisfying Ministers.

  3. Major Projects Authority Annual Report 2013-14

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The purpose of this note is to update the Committee of Public Accounts on developments since the publication of the National Audit Office report in February, particularly the release of the Authority’s second annual report on 23 May.

    June 2014.

  5. The effective management of tax reliefs

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    HM Treasury and HMRC do not keep track of tax reliefs intended to change behaviour, or adequately report to Parliament on whether tax reliefs work as expected.

  6. Progress on the Sellafield site: an update

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The NAO has today published an update for the Public Accounts Committee, detailing developments in the management of the Sellafield site, the UK’s largest and most hazardous nuclear site, and the extent to which progress has been made in decommissioning and cleaning it up.

  7. Over-optimism in government projects

    Insight Lessons learned

    Published on:

    Optimism bias in public sector projects is not a new phenomenon. But it is one that persists, frequently undermining projects’ value for money as time and cost are under estimated and benefits over estimated. This report uses our back catalogue to illustrate the consequences of over optimism. In doing so, we have identified some contributory factors – such as project complexity and an organisation’s culture of challenge.

  8. Crossrail

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The DfT and Transport for London have done well to protect taxpayers’ interests in Crossrail but risks remain including delivery of the trains.

  11. Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs 2013-14 accounts

    Report Financial audit

    Published on:

    The report covers HMRC’s progress in operating the PAYE service, its implementation of its new Real Time Information service and its performance in tax collection and in reducing error and fraud in personal tax credits.

  12. Confiscation Orders

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The use of confiscation orders to deny criminals the proceeds of their crimes is not proving to be value for money.

  14. E-borders and successor programmes

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The Home Office spent at least £830 million between 2003 and 2015 on the e-borders programme and its successors, but has failed, so far, to deliver the full vision. We cannot, therefore view e-borders as having delivered value for money.

  16. Military flying training

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The new military flying training is 6 years delayed and there is much to do if the MoD is to get the planned benefits from its contractor.

  17. Progress in delivering the Thameslink programme

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    Thameslink aims to reduce overcrowding and journey times. Initial progress has been good but a 3 year delay in awarding the train contract puts the 2018 programme deadline at risk.

  19. Oversight of three PFI waste projects

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    All three projects examined by the NAO have experienced significant delays stemming from a range of problems.

  20. Thames Tideway Tunnel: early review of potential risks to value for money

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The Thames Tideway Tunnel is a planned project to build a large sewer running under the River Thames. It is the Government’s preferred solution to the problem of spills from London’s sewers into the tidal part of the Thames. In response to correspondence, we explain the roles of the different parties, identify potential risks to value for money and set out what we expect good project management to look like. To avoid influencing the outcome of ongoing competitions for the construction and financing of the project, we do not evaluate the value for money of the project and the issues raised do not imply any audit judgement about its performance.