Search results for 'Commercial and financial management'

Showing 241 - 260 of 645 results

  1. Financial management in government

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    Stronger financial management will be needed in departments if they are to speed up the restructuring of service delivery.

  2. The first sale of shares in Lloyds Banking Group

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The Government’s first sale of shares in Lloyds Banking Group was managed very effectively by United Kingdom Financial Investments Limited.

  3. Transforming government’s contract management

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    We published two reports today – Following the discovery of widespread and deep-rooted weaknesses in the government’s management of contracts it is starting to improve how it manages its contracts.

  4. Assurance of reported savings at Sellafield

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s systems for recording and challenging claimed savings at Sellafield give moderate assurance of reported overall savings since 2009-10.

  5. Military flying training

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The new military flying training is 6 years delayed and there is much to do if the MoD is to get the planned benefits from its contractor.

  6. The Privatisation of Royal Mail

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The Department was successful in floating Royal Mail. But its approach was marked by deep caution, the price of which was borne by the taxpayer.

  7. General Practice Extraction Service – Investigation

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    Mistakes in the original procurement and contract management of an IT system, designed to extract data from GP practices, contributed to losses of public funds, through asset write-offs and settlements with suppliers.

  8. E-borders and successor programmes

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The Home Office spent at least £830 million between 2003 and 2015 on the e-borders programme and its successors, but has failed, so far, to deliver the full vision. We cannot, therefore view e-borders as having delivered value for money.

  9. 4G radio spectrum auction: lessons learned

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    In its sale of the 4G radio spectrum the Office of Communications (Ofcom) achieved its objective of maintaining a competitive market with a number of competing providers.

  10. Funding healthcare: Making allocations to local areas

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    There is wide variation in the extent to which £79 billion in central funding allocated to local health bodies differs from target allocations that are based on relative need.

    • This is NAO’s first report on funding since the 2013 health reforms took effect. Where possible comparisons have been made with funding under the previous system set out in a 2011 NAO report.

  11. Financial sustainability of local authorities 2014

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    Local authorities have worked hard to manage reductions in government funding, but the DCLG needs to be better informed about the situation across England.

  12. Children in care

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The Department for Education is not meeting its objectives to improve the quality of care and the stability of placements for children in care.

  13. Infrastructure investment: the impact on consumer bills

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    Large-scale infrastructure spending by the private sector over ten years or more will increase consumer utility bills but government and regulators do not know by how much or whether the bills will be affordable.

  14. Oversight of three PFI waste projects

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    All three projects examined by the NAO have experienced significant delays stemming from a range of problems.

  15. Army 2020

    Report Value for money

    Published on:

    The MOD decision to reduce the size of the regular Army and increase the number of trained Army reserves was taken without appropriate testing of feasibility or evaluation of risk.